Hierarchical Proof-of-Stake: A 6-Class Validator Consensus Model for Institutional Blockchain Networks
UnyKorn Research
Abstract
This paper presents a hierarchical Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism where validators are organized into six distinct classes with differentiated consensus weights, staking requirements, and operational responsibilities. We demonstrate that encoding institutional roles (compliance enforcement, bridge operation, custody management) directly into the validator hierarchy reduces the attack surface for regulatory-sensitive transactions while maintaining Byzantine fault tolerance guarantees equivalent to flat PoS systems. We prove that the 2-of-3 policy quorum mechanism achieves consensus-level compliance enforcement with minimal additional latency (< 200ms per regulated transaction). Empirical analysis of the fee-priority mempool shows that pre-consensus policy filtering reduces block validation time by 15-22% compared to post-execution compliance checking.
Sections
- 1Motivation: Why flat validator sets fail institutional requirements
- 2Formal model of 6-class hierarchical consensus
- 3Policy quorum as a consensus-level primitive
- 4Byzantine fault tolerance analysis under class asymmetry
- 5Mempool-level policy filtering: latency and throughput impact
- 6Slashing economics across validator classes
- 7Comparison with Tendermint, Casper FFG, and HotStuff
- 8Experimental results on a 50-validator testnet